The value added by which process ensures a consistent and fair selection process for the seller?

The value added by the selection process ensures a consistent and fair means of choosing a seller. In the context of contract management, selecting a source involves evaluating potential sellers based on set criteria such as price, quality, delivery time, and service capabilities. This thorough and systematic evaluation helps maintain fairness, as each potential seller is assessed using the same standards and procedures.

Moreover, a structured source selection process minimizes the risk of bias or favoritism, contributing to an equitable playing field for all bidders. This not only builds trust among sellers but also enhances the integrity of the procurement process overall. By adhering to documented selection criteria and processes, the organization also ensures compliance with internal policies and regulatory requirements, further solidifying the fairness of the selection process.

While the other options—performing a contract, managing disagreements, and planning negotiations—are all important aspects of contract management, they do not specifically focus on the initial selection of the seller. Performing a contract relates to executing the terms agreed upon after a seller is chosen. Managing disagreements addresses issues that may arise during contract execution, and planning negotiations involves preparing for discussions with a seller after they have been selected. Thus, the primary value added through the selection process is the assurance of a consistent and fair approach to choosing a seller